新科学想法 › 文献管理 › 浏览文献

Don't look stupid: avoiding pitfalls when recommending research papers

热2 阿平添加于 2009-10-21 04:04 | 3133 次阅读 | 4 个评论

作者
McNee SM, Kapoor N, Konstan JA
摘要
If recommenders are to help people be more productive, they need to support a wide variety of real-world information seeking tasks, such as those found when seeking research papers in a digital library. There are many potential pitfalls, including not knowing what tasks to support, generating recommendations for the wrong task, or even failing to generate any meaningful recommendations whatsoever. We posit that different recommender algorithms are better suited to certain information seeking tasks. In this work, we perform a detailed user study with over 130 users to understand these differences between recommender algorithms through an online survey of paper recommendations from the ACM Digital Library. We found that pitfalls are hard to avoid. Two of our algorithms generated 'atypical' recommendations recommendations that were unrelated to their input baskets. Users reacted accordingly, providing strong negative results for these algorithms. Results from our 'typical' algorithms show some qualitative differences, but since users were exposed to two algorithms, the results may be biased. We present a wide variety of results, teasing out differences between algorithms. Finally, we succinctly summarize our most striking results as "Don't Look Stupid" in front of users.
详细资料
- 文献种类:会议
- 会议: the 2006 20th anniversary conference
- 期卷页: 2006年 171页
- 出版社: ACM Press
- 位置: Banff, Alberta, Canada
- 日期: 2006-
- ISBN: 1595932496
标签

文献推荐
相关链接 DOI URL
附件
全文查看

阿平的文献笔记订阅

在线文献管理的最终目标不是把文献管理好就行了，在线的好处在于其能集中所有的用户的资源，来为用户个人提供更多、更符合用户口味的信息。其中一项便是将一些专业的文献推送到特定专业用户的浏览页面中，此所谓文献推荐。

新科学目前的文献基数还不大，现在就做这个工作可能不会带来什么近期效果，但是我们也要提前去思考这个问题，在现在的功能设计完善的同时，还要为推荐文献此类功能埋下伏笔，一边将来能平滑的过度，为科研工作者创造更多的价值。

管理选项： 导出文献

发表评论评论(4 人)

!reply! cindycppsu 2011-2-18 11:25: 新科学非常棒！我看国外有mendeley，琢磨国内是否也有相似的网站，果然就找到了新科学，感觉比mendeley还舒服！加油！

!reply! 阿平 2011-2-19 01:01: cindycppsu: 新科学非常棒！我看国外有mendeley，琢磨国内是否也有相似的网站，果然就找到了新科学，感觉比mendeley还舒服！加油！ ...
，谢谢支持，希望能一起参与进来，让新科学变得更好用，更有用

!reply! wwhasxl0911 2011-5-9 02:33: Mendeley很好用，而且文献很多。对文献的管理很细，比如你存储了一篇文章，页面旁边就可以注明作者，关键词，摘要，时间，城市，出版商等。除了这些细节，还可以添加对这篇文章的note。新科学有这个功能吗？还有就是真正的社交研究性站点在中国不多，不知道是不是中国人都用了外国的SRNS，社会科学（中文）这一块也该需要啊。